The purpose of such maneuvers is to shed as much light as possible on Vought’s power grab and make lawmakers pick a side: the people or the man who is single-handedly eviscerating Congress’ power of the purse with devastating effects. https://t.co/RPiicC6swI

Filing a motion to impeach would give House Democrats an opportunity to outline the case against Vought in a public forum — and force House Republicans to go on record in support of the OMB’s onslaught against the public good. https://t.co/XYqSWhp96R

Democrats can write op-eds and talk to news anchors and podcasters, perhaps even alongside affected constituents. They should ensure that all of this material is adapted for and then mass-distributed on every social media channel. https://t.co/GnbNWGhh9t

If Dems take back one/both chambers in the midterms, they can haul Vought in front of a different committee every week to make him publicly justify his cruelty. After each hearing, they can play clips of Vought’s answers at rallies, interspersed w/ commentary from his victims. https://t.co/SPDXTiy4xR

The aforementioned information could form the basis for an incessant stream of congressional letters demanding that Vought answer hard-hitting questions and press conferences exposing OMB’s intransigence. https://t.co/fpya7ofQB5

Senate Democrats might elevate the most compelling examples from their states, and they could also assemble statewide and nationwide data to ensure that an individual’s suffering is properly contextualized as part of a broader phenomenon affecting millions of people. https://t.co/a4oUqwbp17