Ethics in Government

October 31, 2024

Court Accountability, Revolving Door Project, Take Back the Court, and True North Research

Memo 2024 ElectionEthics in GovernmentSupreme Court

Memo: Remembering Bush v. Gore

We cannot forget the fundamental wrongheadedness of the Court’s ruling in Bush v. Gore, which was possible only with the votes of at least two justices whose conflicts of interest merited recusal, one of whom reportedly “provided the early framework” for the decision before oral arguments were even presented to the Court.

October 30, 2024

Jeff Hauser

Press Release

2024 ElectionEthics in GovernmentSupreme Court

RELEASE: We Can (And Should) Reasonably Question The Impartiality Of Clarence Thomas And Samuel Alito In Election-Related Cases

On Wednesday, the Supreme Court allowed a purge of Virginia voters identified as non-citizens to go through, even though many who will be removed from the voter rolls are known to be citizens. This sort of purge is explicitly barred by the National Voter Registration Act, but the Court’s right-wing justices nonetheless allowed it to continue—raising questions about their motives.

September 03, 2024

Hannah Story Brown

Blog Post

Climate and EnvironmentEthics in GovernmentRevolving Door

Political Appointees Need A Bright Line Ethics Rule: No Individual Stocks

The Revolving Door Project has previously proposed that the Biden administration pass an executive order enshrining a strongest-ever ethics commitment for executive branch political appointees. Among other things, this commitment would include a pledge not to own individual stocks while in public office. A new Inspector General report on the ethical minefield of a high-level EPA appointee who owns dozens of individual companies’ stocks demonstrates why this sort of simple, clear ethics rule is essential for increasing trust in government.